Two quotes on the desk, both at 0.24 a sheet. One is 250 gsm, 530 by 325 mm, 1.0 litre nominal. The other is 400 gsm, same footprint, 1.6 litres nominal. Same price, same size, same supplier category. On the face of it the 400 gsm is the better buy, and on a real tray it may be the more expensive one.
Price per sheet is the least useful number in this purchase. Cost per kilo thawed is the one that survives a year of production.
Take a tray that thaws 9 kg of pork loin in 24 hours at 3 °C, 2 percent drip, so 180 ml. The 250 gsm sheet handles that with margin, one sheet, one change. Cost per kilo thawed: 0.24 divided by 9, or 2.7 cents.
Now the same tray with a 22 kg load, 5 percent drip, 1.1 litres, thawing 30 hours. The 250 gsm sheet needs a change at 12 hours, so two sheets, 0.48 for 22 kg, or 2.2 cents per kilo. The 400 gsm handles it in one, 0.24 for 22 kg, 1.1 cents. On the heavy load the thicker sheet halves the cost. On the light load it is simply twice the material for the same result.
This is why a single pad specification across a kitchen is usually wrong in both directions at once.
Litres on a datasheet are measured in free swell: a sheet in a bath of water, unloaded, at room temperature. On a tray, the figure is optimistic by 20 to 40 percent, because the load compresses the sheet, the drip is colder and more viscous, and the water arrives at one patch rather than evenly.
A 400 gsm sheet rated 1.6 litres will typically hold about 1.0 to 1.2 litres before the face goes tacky under a real load. The 250 gsm rated 1.0 usually delivers 0.6 to 0.7. If you size to the datasheet you will be changing sheets at the point you thought you had headroom.
Two sheets side by side on a bench, each under a 2 kg weight distributed over a 200 by 200 mm plate. Pour 100 ml of water at 4 °C onto the plate edge every four minutes and time how long until the surface beside the weight is damp to a tissue. That is your usable working capacity, not the nominal one. Repeat with a 5 kg weight and you will see how quickly compression takes its cut.
The test is crude and it is decisive. Two pads at the same price per sheet usually differ by 30 to 50 percent on this measure, and the difference tracks the fibre-to-polymer ratio rather than the grammage.
In one trial across 40 trays, the cheaper-per-litre pad won on cost per kilo despite a higher sheet price, because it held its capacity under load. The expensive-looking sheet collapsed at the contact patch and had to be doubled on heavy trays, which nobody had budgeted for.
Price per sheet rarely survives contact with a delivery. A pallet of 250 gsm sheets is lighter and takes less cubic space than the same count of 400 gsm, so the landed cost per sheet can differ by 15 percent even when the quoted prices are identical. Ask for the carton dimensions and the sheets per carton before comparing, because a supplier quoting per sheet on a bulky product is often quoting a number that will not survive the freight.
Minimum order quantities do the same thing in reverse. A site that needs 400 sheets a month but has to buy 2,000 to get the price will store 1,600 of them in a humid back room for four months, where they pick up moisture and lose loft before they are used. Paying 8 percent more for a monthly delivery is usually the cheaper decision, and it is the one that keeps the sheet in the tray performing like the sheet on the datasheet.
Ask what the polymer loading is per square metre before you compare two quotes, because that number, not the grammage, is what usually separates them on a loaded tray.
Ask for the sheet weight, the polymer loading and a compression figure. Florpoly publishes the per-grade loading figures on its own site, which is a quicker start than a round of supplier emails. If a supplier cannot give you the third, buy a box of each and run the bench test. Twenty minutes and a kitchen scale will tell you more than a specification sheet, and it costs less than one rejected tray of loin.
Zhengzhou Flor New Materials Co., Ltd. specializes in SAP super‑absorbent polymer products. Serving personal hygiene, agriculture & horticulture, pet supplies and other industries, we leverage supply‑chain resources to provide particle‑size selection, performance matching and customized solutions based on clients’ practical requirements.
© 2026. All Rights Reserved.